Asian
NGOs call on UN member-states to reject
Sri Lankas Human Rights Council
election bid
Your
Excellency,
We, the undersigned Asian
human rights non-governmental
organisations, write to urge that your
government not vote for Sri Lanka for
membership in the United Nations Human
Rights Council in the election taking
place in the General Assembly on May 21,
2008, because of the countrys
evident failure to meet the Councils
membership standards.
Asia does not have a
functioning regional human rights system,
making the United Nations human
rights mechanisms, notably the Human
Rights Council, of increased significance
for victims in the region. Under the
Human Rights Council, Asia now has 13
members and an increasingly important
role to play in steering the global
effort in favour of human rights.
Ensuring the highest standard of Council
members from the Asian region is of great
importance.
We have therefore
carefully scrutinized the human rights
records of the six candidates currently
vying for the four seats available to the
Asian region in the upcoming election,
based on our collective experience as
Asian NGOs working to improve human
rights protection in Asia. Sri
Lankastands out as the candidate that
suffers from the gravest ongoing human
rights violations, the most significant
lack of cooperation with the Council, and
the least evidence of measures being
taken to protect citizens from violations
and to deliver justice and reparation to
victims of abuses. Sri Lankais without
doubt the least suitable candidate of all
those bidding for election this year,
making it vital for your government to
not support it.
We write to support the
position of human rights organizations
from Sri Lanka that wrote to UN members
on April 28, 2008, stating that the
government of Sri Lanka fails to meet the
Councils membership standards, has
presided over a grave deterioration
of human rights protection since
first winning membership in 2006, and
has used its membership of the
Human Rights Council to protect itself
from scrutiny.. We also strongly
support the campaign launched on May 6,
2008, by a coalition of international
NGOs opposing Sri Lankas candidacy
(please see further at: http://www.hrw.org/effectiveHRC/SriLanka/).
We recall that General
Assembly (GA) resolution 60/251 requires
that members elected to the Council
shall uphold the highest standards in the
promotion and protection of human rights
and fully cooperate with the
Council.
Failure to uphold the
highest standards: It is very clear
that Sri Lanka has not only failed to
meet this central criterion for
membership in the Council during the last
two years, but has become one of the
worst human rights violators in the
region and among the most negative voices
within the Council during this time. Sri
Lankan government forces have been
directly implicated in a wide range of
grave rights abuses, including:
- hundreds of extrajudicial
killings, including of
humanitarian workers;
- hundreds of enforced
disappearances, the highest rate
of new cases recorded by the
Working Group on Enforced and
Involuntary Disappearances in
2007
- arbitrary arrests and long-term
detentions without charge or
trial;
- widespread torture of detainees,
a routine practice
both by the police and the armed
forces according the U.N.
Special Rapporteur on Torture;
- forcibly returning internally
displaced persons to unsafe
areas;
- unwarranted restrictions on media
freedoms, and threats and
killings of journalists;
- complicity with the recruitment
of child soldiers by the Karuna
militia; and
- denunciations and threats against
human rights defenders and
humanitarian workers.
Few
if any proper investigations have been
launched into these most serious rights
abuses and impunity reigns. Political
will and sincerity on the part of the
authorities to address these human rights
remains elusive. These problems are
compounded by the authorities having
failed to provide easily accessible
avenues enabling victims of human rights
abuses to make complaints. Extreme delays
in adjudication make it near-futile to
pursue such complaints, when made.
Witnesses and victims have been harassed
and even killed while seeking redress.
Failure
to cooperate: Sri Lanka has been a
member of the Council over the last two
years, while its government forces have
continued committing widespread
violations, so there can be no pretence
that its future membership will bring
about positive change. Instead, it is
clear that Sri Lanka is making use of its
Council membership to shield itself from
criticism, thus undermining the Council
itself and all the efforts made by UN
members to create a Council free from the
destructive forces that fatally damaged
the Commission on Human Rights.
Cooperation with the
Council should not just be measured
simply by a states inviting
international officials to visit, but
also through the quality of the
cooperation with such experts and other
mechanisms, as well as the extent to
which their recommendations are
implemented. On these counts, Sri Lankas
record is deplorable. Sri Lankan
government officials have launched
unacceptable and unfounded personal
attacks on respected international
officials who have visited the country
and raised human rights concerns. These
include U.N. High Commissioner for Human
Rights Louise Arbour, U.N. Special
Advisor on Children and Armed Conflict
Allan Rock, U.N. Undersecretary-General
for Humanitarian Affairs John Holmes.
When Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called
such comments unacceptable and
unwarranted, a Sri Lankan cabinet
minister said that he didnt
give a damn what the U.N.
secretary-general had to say.
The Sri Lankan government
has made desperate attempts to block a
realistic solution to the grave situation
in the country by refusing much needed
international assistance, notably by
rebuffing the key recommendation by
several special procedures and by the
OHCHR to establish a human rights
monitoring mission under the auspices of
the UN to document and report on
violations committed by all sides to the
conflict and to prevent further
violations.
Sri Lanka has a very poor
record on cooperation with the Councils
special procedures: the government did
not reply to any of the
12questionnaires sent by special
procedures mandate holders between
1/1/2004 and 31/12/2007, nor to over half
of the 9 letters of allegations and
urgent appeals sent by special procedures
in that period. Sri Lanka has not
implemented the principal recommendations
of the Working Group on Enforced or
Involuntary Disappearances and the
Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial
Killings. The Special Rapporteur on
Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment
observed that Sri Lankan authorities
impeded his fact-finding, citing instances
where detainees were hidden or brought
away shortly before the Special
Rapporteur arrived.
We abhor all acts of
violence and recognise that the armed
separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil
Eelam (LTTE) are responsible for numerous
and ongoing serious human rights
violations. We call on them to cease all
such abuses immediately. However, abuses
by non-state armed groups do not justify
rights violations by state forces. The
government has been hiding behind such
justifications rather than taking
concrete action to protect rights and
deliver justice to victims.
Dont vote for
Sri Lanka: A vote for Sri Lanka is a
vote for disappearances, widespread
torture, extra-judicial killings and
impunity. It is a vote to undermine the
Human Rights Council and therefore a vote
against victims of human rights the world
over. We who work directly with victims
urge you in the strongest possible terms
to take this opportunity to show your
governments support for present and
potential victims of human rights, as
well as support for the Human Rights
Council. The rejection of Sri Lankas
bid would strengthen the Council,
shielding it from those that seek to
misuse it at the cost of many lives.
Local, regional and international NGOs
are united in calling on you to
resoundingly reject this years
worst candidate.
Dont vote for
Sri Lanka.
|