|
|||
|
|||
|
13
October 2010 The sentences of the 6 convicted of the Khairlanji murder were commuted. While 4 of them were commuted from death penalty to 25-year imprisonment, the other 2 kept their life sentences. In the investigation, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was criticized for its neglect of a number of evidence which indicated the murder as a caste-discrimination. The Bombay High Court has refused to invoke the provisions of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and insisted the case as a “revenge murder”. While civil society, especially human rights groups, disapproved death penalty as an effective way to prevent similar tragedy, they criticized that the court, the state government and the investigation agencies have intentionally neglected the discrimination based on caste system, which mainly intrigued the murders. This neglect of the caste-discrimination has connived the caste-based atrocities. In the Khairlanji murders, a Dalit family, Bhotmange, was killed on 29 September 2006, with some family members raped, by higher caste villagers. However, local media has failed to report the crisis of humanity. To magnify the voice of the vulnerable and to demand justice for the Bhotmange family, ACPP issued UA061122(9) in November 2006. Sources: Asian
Human Rights Commission, zeenews.com and Daily News and Analysis |
|||
|
31 July 2009 Regarding the caste atrocity on the Bhotmange family at Khairlanji village, Bhandara, only eight of the forty-six arrested were sentenced, two receiving life imprisonment and the other six were sentenced to death on 24 September last year. Three persons were acquitted for lack of evidence. In spite of the harsh punishment, the lower court at Bhandara denied caste hatred as the motive of the murder of the family. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) insisted that there was caste hatred behind the convicts. Thus in the hearing on 1 June 2009, CBI filed an appeal seeking reversal for the three acquittals and suggesting death penalty for the two life-sentenced convicts. The CBI official was questioned by the high court and was directed to submit detailed evidence of the murder, including the charges, the witness and their specific statement given to the authorities. In its appeal, the CBI was relying on a recent ruling of the Supreme Court which mentioned that a caste angle in the first information report was not necessary to establish an atrocity case. If the case were judged according to the Supreme Court, the crime committed will be less serious and the sentence will hence be lighter. Thus, the CBI, during the hearing on 2 July 2009, insisted that all the accused were convicted for the same crime and hatred against Dalits, so they should all deserve the same punishment. The High Court has not admitted the appeals and posted the matter for the next hearing on 24 August. In order to send a message against caste violence and to ensure the rights of Dalits, it is essential to investigate and try the case properly. The murders should be lodged under the appropriate sections of the Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1959, instead of non-cognizable offences or refusing to file complaints against higher caste groups. UA061122(9) was issued in November 2006 to urge the authorities to respect and protect the rights of Dalits both in this case and in general. Sources: Indian Express, |
|||
|
|
|||
|
2 June 2009 Within 6 months of the
verdict of the special court on 24 September 2008, which found 8 accused
guilty of murdering the Dalit family, Bhotmange at Khairlanju village, Bhandara,
the convicted accused have filed an appeal in the Only with efforts of vigilant social activists, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had later submitted a petition, on behalf of the victim, Bhaiyyal Bhotmange, in the Nagpur Bench, appealing the High Court against acquittal of the 3 accused, acquittal of the 8 accused from charges under the Prevention of Atrocity Acts, as well as enhancement of punishment from life imprisonment to death sentence. This showed that continuous alert and timely interventions are necessary to ensure justice to victims, especially when the judiciary is reluctant to act. Although heavy punishment was imposed for the crime against Dalits in September 2008, apparently sending a message against perpetrators of caste violence, the charges were not invoked under the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 and the relevant sections under the Indian Penal Code, thus ruling out caste hatred and rape in the massacre. Treating it as just another criminal act, the judgment dismissed the caste -based reality of the horrific crime. In support of the struggle of the Dalit community in India, and efforts against atrocities committed against them as reflected in the massacre of the Bhotmange family, ACPP issued UA061122(9) in 2006 to urge the authorities for proper registration of complaints against the perpetrators and protection of Dalit communities.
|
|||
|
16 October 2008 Considering
that the case involved murder of people belonging to a lower caste and harsh
punishment was given to the accused, it was a significant verdict regarding
the Khairlanji massacre, where 4 members of a Dalit
family in Ghandara district of Maharashtra were
paraded naked, tortured, sexually assaulted and then beaten to death on 29
September 2006. Within 2 years of the incident, on 24 September 2008, a
fast track sessions court in Bhandara awarded death
penalty to 6 convicted persons and life imprisonment to 2 of them. |
|||
|
30 May 2007 In September 2006, a mob of upper caste Hindus
massacred 4 members of a dalit family in Khairlanji
village at Bhandara district in |
|||
|
29 March 2007 Out of forty-six people who were arrested in
connection with the killing of four members of the Bhotmange
family in September 2006, thirty-five have been discharged on 12 February
2007. They were earlier granted bail after completion of 90 days of
magisterial custody remand. Among the discharged were the former head of Andhalgaon police station in Bhandara
district, under whose jurisdiction Khairlanji
village falls. Meanwhile, NGOs in Mumbai protested against the release and
submitted a memorandum. |