|
|
| Commemorate
8888 Uprising, Demand a Democratic Government |
|
UA080807(5)) |
|
30 January
2010
On
4 January 2010, the Burma military junta announced
that the general elections will be held this year
and, on 6 January, it specified the date of election
would be 10 October. Junta claimed the coming
election as part of the transition to civilian
rule process and roadmap to democracy.
Burma's military leader, Than Shwe, has urged people
to make a correct choice" in the coming
election. Without spelling out the meaning, many
Burmese would interpret his comments as an implicit
warning.
The coming election will be the first one since 1990
election, in which the National League of Democracy
had a landslide victory but were immediately
subjected to vigorous suppression from the military
government, such as detention of Aung San Suu Kyi and
several other oppositions, and were never allowed to
take the power.
Opposition groups refused to recognize the coming
election unless their requests are fulfilled.
Requests include engagement of the junta in dialogue
with all stakeholders, a comprehensive review of the
Constitution 2008 and release of all political
prisoners, including Aung San Suu Kyi.
Due to defects of the current constitution, it is
believed that, in the coming election, a substantial
number of seats in Parliament would be reserved for
the military and individuals being loyal to the
junta. According to a local source, many incumbent
ministers planned to resign from their post and
announce their candidacy around April, giving
themselves the necessary six months to prepare for
election campaign. It is also expected that a few
pro-junta political parties would be formed to
compete for the election. Obviously, the junta has
begun its election-jockeying to ensure their power in
the government. The democratic election is merely a
tactic to garner international approval.
American diplomats have emphasized that Washingtons
wide array of political and economic sanctions would
not be relaxed until progress was made on human
rights, referring to the rules and conducts of the
coming elections.
A number of neighbouring countries in the Association
of Southeast Asian Nations have said that they would
closely watch the election to gauge the countrys
progress on human rights.
Aung San Suu Kyi who has been detained for 14 of the
past 20 years and remains under house arrest in
Yangon (Rangoon). Last August, she was sentenced for
further detention by 18 months, allegedly for
violating detention rules because of an American, who
swam across a lake and stayed in her residence. An
appeal hearing was conducted at Myanmar's Supreme
Court on 18 January 2010, but a ruling might be a
week away. She was barred from attending the hearing.
Her lawyer has argued that the law she was charged
under was no longer applicable because it was part of
the 1974 Constitution, which have been reformed in
2008. If the Supreme Court upholds the decision, Aung
will be unable to participate in coming elections.
To join the collective efforts to urge for release of
political prisoners and a democratic government in
Burma, ACPP issued SUA070928(3) and UA080807(5) in 2007 and
2008 respectively.
Sources:
BBC News, the New York Times,
Asashi Shimbun, Burma Partnership, United Press
International, Aljazeera.net
|
30
November 2009
The
recent action of the United States (US) showed her
change in diplomatic approach with Burma (Myanmar).
On 4 November 2009, Kurt Campbell, Assistant
Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific
Affairs, had a private meeting with Aung San Suu Kyi,
preceding the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
(APEC) Summit in Singapore, in which US President,
Barack Obama, met 10 leaders from the Association of
Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), including General
Than Shwe, the head of the military regime.
Regarding the new policy of US, direct
engagement was highlighted with aims of
strong support for human rights, the release of
Aung San Suu Kyi and all other political prisoners
and the promotion of democratic reform.
However, critics said that the US administration has
nevertheless set improvement of human rights
condition in the country as a condition for an end to
sanctions against the Asian country. It is also worth
noting that the statement released in the APEC
meeting expected US engagement policy would
contribute to broad political and economic
reforms, and the 2010 elections must be
conducted in a free, fair, inclusive and transparent
manner in order to be credible to the international
community. However it did not mention the
release of Aung San Suu Kyi.
Within the country, some change of attitude of the
opposition party towards the regime was noted in Aung
San Suu Kyis letter to the State Peace and
Development Council, dated 11 November. The letter
stated that Aung San Suu Kyi is ready to cooperate
with Burmas ruling junta in discussions on how
to end the economic sanctions applied against the
country by the US, the European Union and other
countries.
The strive of civil society for a genuine election
continues as the Shwegondaing Declaration, in which
the National League of Democracy (NLD) states the
condition of election, won support from around 400
participants of the International Symposium on Burma
in Tokyo, in the end of November. Some of the
supporters re-iterated that the international
community, including Japan, should give a clear
message to the Burmese regime that they would not
recognize the result of the 2010 election if the
junta fails to respond to the demand of the NLD. On
the other hand, Jeff Kingston, director of Asian
Studies at Temple Universitys Japan campus,
stated that, if Aung San Suu Kyi is to play a role in
lifting sanctions, the junta would have to create
conditions that would enable her to do so, which
means restoring her political rights, allowing free
and fair elections and respecting the outcome, even
if military proxies do not prevail.
Democracy will never come about without persistent
struggle. To join the concerted effort with the
international community, ACPP issued UA080807(5) and SUA070928(3) in 2007 and
2008 respectively, to call for release of all the
political prisoners in Burma.
Sources:
AsiaNews, Burma Partnership, the Irrawaddy, Reuters
|
30
September 2009
According
to the Thailand-based Assistance Association for
Political Prisoners Burma (AAPP), 127
political dissidents were among the 7,114 prisoners
announced to be released on 18 September. Earlier in
the month, Burmese prison authorities have declared
that 250 political prisoners would be released.
While AAPP welcomed the release of prisoners, it
still falls far short of international demands: some
of the political prisoners who had been released had
nearly finished their prison terms, for example.
Thus, AAPP will continue their call for the immediate
release of more than 2,000 political prisoners. They
also reminded that key opposition leaders, like Aung
San Suu Kyi, Min Ko Naing and ethnic Shan leader Khun
Htun remain in detention, and pressure on dissidents
is on going.
Critics of the Burmese military regime claimed that
the recent mass release of prisoners was merely an
attempt to deflect international criticism and ease
international pressure: earlier this year in
February, an amnesty was announced after the United
Nations Human Rights Rapporteur, Tomas Quintana, left
Burma following an official visit, while the recent
announcement in September came three days before the
departure of Burmese Prime Minister, General Than
Shwe, to New York to attend the UN General Assembly.
Moreover, New York-based Human Rights Watch has urged
the release of Burmese political prisoners on 16
September, accusing the regime of doubling the number
of political prisoners since September 2007.
It should be noted that the release of prisoners in
September, or in February 2009, does not reflect the
progress towards democracy. Out of thousands of
prisoners released, only a handful was political
prisoners. In 2007, only 20 political prisoners were
released out of 8,585; in 2008, nine out of 9,002;
and in February 2009, there were 31 out of 6,293. The
most prominent of them, Aung San Suu Kyi, was
sentenced to 18 months house arrest in August 2009,
apparently to prevent her involvement in the next
election in 2010.
ACPP issued UA080807(5)
in August 2008 to mark the 20th anniversary
of the 8888 Uprising in Burma, together with
concerned groups all over the world. Among the
demands of the UA was to release all
political prisoners, including Aung San Suu Kyi.
Sources:
Irrawaddy, Burma Partnership
|
| |
16 October
2008
On
8 August 2008, 48 youth marched to commemorate 20th
anniversary of 8888 Uprising in Taunggok Township of
Arakan State. Protesters were arrested but
released on the following day, except 5 of them
whowere sentenced to two-and-a-half years
imprisonment on 15 August. Nyi Pu, chairman of
Arakan State National League for Democracy and Dr.
Tin Min Htut, Member of Parliament from the Panthanaw
constituency in Irrawaddy Division, were arrested by
police at their homes in Rangoon on 12 August.
It is suspected that the authorities believed they
maneuvered the youth protest against the regime on 8
August.
According to Assistance Association for
Political Prisoners (Burma), 39 activists were
arrested in August 2008, with 21 of them being
imprisoned..
To stand with courageous people in Burma to
demand for democracy, Hotline Asia issued UA080807(5)
in August 2008.
Sources:
Mizzima News
Assistance Association for
Political Prisoners (Burma)
Burma Digest
|